whitespace in revision ids

[Robert Collins]

I've just realised that we have considerable code that assumes there are
no whitespace minimally ( \r\n\t) characters in revision ids.

I don't see any value in whitespace in revision ids (unlike non-ascii
characters which are useful for representing uids) and quite a bit of
potential for confusion.

Can we make them explicitly banned ?

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060407/6a6bae41/attachment.pgp