[RFC][MERGE][BZRK][Still reading?] Shiny new revision-layout for bzrk

[Robert Collins]

On Fri, 2006-03-31 at 10:02 +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Robert Collins wrote:
> >On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 14:28 +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> >> This one time, at band camp, Robert Collins wrote:
> >> >My new branch for bzrk at
> >> >http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~lifeless/bzrk/trunk (pushed via sftp, will
> >> >be available in 10 minutes) contains a new revision layout, discussed
> >> >with David yesterday, and hacked up today. From the log:
> >> >Make revision sorting and linking use merge_sorted from latest bzr.dev.
> >> >This  gives a much nicer layout with features such as 'fully merged
> >> >branches' not being inappropriately shown as active - rather then point
> >> >the branch is resurrected has its merge from mainline linked. This leads
> >> >to a narrow, more understandable view, and much less cross-hatch cases -
> >> >perhaps none in fact.
> >> >
> >> >this looks -really- nice IMNSHO. Please have a look and a play.
> >> 
> >> Also fixes an annoyance I've had for a while, correct chronological ordering
> >> of revisions.
> >> 
> >> Thanks, I've merged into my branch.
> >
> >Sweet. I have some performance improvements to bzrlib and bzrk pending
> >for this, I'll try to shake them down and commit today.
> 
> Cool :)
> 
> Actually I have to retract my statement about chronological ordering, I've
> been able to find some cases where the list is not ordered chronologically,
> which I think confuses the information.  You can see a few cases of this
> happen in  http://repo.spacepants.org/tuffet/tuffet.dev .
> 
> (I can send you a screenshot of the offending areas if you like.)

Please. or at least some deeee-tails of what it looks like.

> I did try to work out how do make the graph generator do what I wanted, but
> it's kinda hairy at the moment :)

The ordering is done by bzrlib now - bzrlib/tsort.py, and should be
fairly unhaired.

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060331/9668bd1e/attachment.pgp