Possible bug in bzr diff

Goffredo Baroncelli kreijack at alice.it
Wed Mar 22 05:53:24 GMT 2006


On Wednesday 22 March 2006 02:22, you (Aaron Bentley) wrote:
> Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> 
> | Sorry, my patch isn't intended to add support for renaming/moving to the
> | *unix* patch command. The aim of the my patch is to make coherent the
> bzr diff
> | command with itself.
> 
> But the bzr diff command attempts to mimic the diff command in almost
> every other respect (e.g. useless tabs in the file labels, add/delete
> represented as diffs against /dev/null).  So representing renames as
> create/delete pairs would be more self-consistent than what you're
> suggesting.

I don't discuss the idea of representing/implementing renames as
create/delete pairs or its consistency with the _current_ bzr diff behaviour. 
What I say is that if a file is renamed the bzr diff command use the new 
and the old name in the diff header, so I tough that if a parent directory 
is renamed, that should be show in the header also.

Goffredo


-- 
gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo) <kreijack at inwind.it>
Key fingerprint = CE3C 7E01 6782 30A3 5B87  87C0 BB86 505C 6B2A CFF9




More information about the bazaar mailing list