Lobbying for -p1 diffs
Matthew D. Fuller
fullermd at over-yonder.net
Thu Mar 2 00:43:51 GMT 2006
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:54:17AM +1100 I heard the voice of
Michael Ellerman, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> No, -p is for applying a patch to a file that's not in the current
> directory. And on any serious source tree that means *every patch*.
> So if you're typing -p0 anyway, you might as well by typing -p1.
But I don't type any -p at all :p
> Ah bollocks, it's a couple of extra characters on the front of the
> path!
Yes, but it means I have to _read_, rather than _scan_ (and really, I
have to scan, then take a mental fault when it failed, and go back and
read, so it kills me on latency). I expect the path in the filename
to be the path to the file, not the path to the file except with a
non-existent top-level label.
--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd at over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
More information about the bazaar
mailing list