'upgrade' should 'check' ?

[James Blackwell]

On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 03:30:22PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 22:24 -0600, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> > Robert Collins wrote:
> > > I wonder if it makes sense to have a mandatory 'check' occur when
> > > upgrading ?
> > > 
> > > Rob
> > > 
> > 
> > Are you saying it should check before or after? I think running 'check'
> > after would make sense. And consider it 'failed' if check doesn't pass.
> 
> Running it before would let us ensure that the weave ancestry graph is
> correct and so forth. That would make the logic in 'upgrade' be simpler
> in some cases.
+1

-- 
My home page:   <a href="http://jblack.linuxguru.net">James Blackwell</a>
Gnupg 06357400  F-print AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060222/24771c30/attachment.pgp