tags (was: Re: 0.8 release plans)

[Erik Bågfors]

2006/2/11, Robey Pointer <robey at lag.net>:
>
> On 7 Feb 2006, at 18:21, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 13:12 +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> >> I'd like to sketch a map for an 0.8 release in the next few weeks.
> >
> >>  * tagging
> >
> > We need to sort out that consensus thing. were did that thread go :).
> > I think the rest are largely non controversial and its just a
> > matter of
> > focus.
>
> Maybe this will start that thread up again... :)
>
> Does anyone *not* like jam's compromise proposal? (on the wiki -- I'm
> offline so I can't find it right now)  If nobody speaks up, let's
> just do that. ;)

I just have a question.  I think I read that someone wanted to be able
to annotate revisions.  So that someone can go in and annotate my
commit and say that I suck and my changes brings in bugs, for example.

This means that we will have multiple properties on a revision and
they should all be able to be merged, etc.  It seams like it should
use the same code for these two things?

Not that I know what I'm talking about here :)

/Erik