repositories - pinning down discovery behaviour

Robert Collins robertc at robertcollins.net
Wed Feb 8 01:27:45 GMT 2006


On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 08:25 +0100, Denys Duchier wrote:
> Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> writes:
> 
> > So, I have reversed my position there - I'm seeking a +1 on:
> > 'support nested branches using a single repository' and
> > 'shared repositories will have a marker of some sort'
> 
> I suggested assigning a uuid at shared-repo creation time to make (what I
> called) "inheritance" a bit more robust.

I'm not sure why its more robust. Branches are not coupled to
repositories, only to the presence of the revision data. Having branches
not directly contained by their repository makes gc very hard; the only
things I can see a uuid allowing are violations of the rule about being
contained [i.e. by allowing repo contains repo contains branch using the
outer repo].

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060208/667cc1d0/attachment.pgp 


More information about the bazaar mailing list