Warping minds with the phrase "changeset"

[James Blackwell]

I wrote up a blog entry today that is intended to be the basis of a later,
better written article. In the entry I use the term "changeset"
(reference: http://jblack.linuxguru.net/CVStoBazaarNG).  The comments I've
received were generally favorable and limited to 'fix up this sentence and
its pretty good' type comments. 

One of the more experienced users expressed a concern to me that I warping
minds and that I should stop: "We do not have changesets. Please stop
warping peoples' minds." I'm not quite sure what to do with the comment. I
want to convey a clear conceptual understanding in my writing that we have
something that is not like CVS. I do not want to so at the cost of
destroying minds.

It may seem that I overly focus on terms. I'm not being myopic; I just
usually end up being the first person to try and put our concepts into a
descriptive format.

-- 
My home page:   <a href="http://jblack.linuxguru.net">James Blackwell</a>
Gnupg 06357400  F-print AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D  247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060129/a2891674/attachment.pgp