Voting foo as PQM policy?

[Matthieu Moy]

Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> writes:

> What about latency? Branches age - and signatures would [presumably] be
> only on the revid that PQM found on the branch, to stop bait-and-switch
> problems. So, would the review cycle be fast enough to address this ?.
> Also, if changes are needed, do previous votes still apply? (and how is
> this represented given the bait-and-switch issues that relate to this) 

IIRC, such policy had been discussed for GNU Arch and the "bug goo".
The policy sounded reasonable, but it just has never been implemented.

-- 
Matthieu