attn folk doing reviews.

[Martin Pool]

On 23 Jan 2006, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 16:01 +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> > I put some thoughts up here about what I'd really like in a tool for
> > reviewing incoming changes:
> > 
> >   http://bazaar.canonical.com/ReviewInterface
> 
> This is a reminder to update this now ;)

Yep, done.

One thing that came out of talking about this was that I could really
separate the "review" and "integrate" roles more.  That is to say (if
I'm not putting the wrong words in Robert's mouth) that a patch can be
reviewed and get a provisional +1 even if it currently fails tests when
merged into mainline.  Obviously those need to be fixed up by either the
original submitter or someone else before it finally goes in but it's
possible that the fixes are small enough that it doesn't need to go
around for review again.

-- 
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060123/d51e9c67/attachment.pgp