bzr too slow

John Arbash Meinel john at arbash-meinel.com
Wed Jan 11 13:31:08 GMT 2006


Johan Rydberg wrote:
> Erik Bågfors <zindar at gmail.com> writes:
> 
> 
>>On a new branch.
>>
>>: [bagfors at zyrgelkwyt]$ ; time bzr st
>>
>>real    13m30.754s
>>user    9m43.387s
>>sys     0m8.334s
>>
>>: [bagfors at zyrgelkwyt]$ ; time bzr st
>>
>>real    0m5.468s
>>user    0m3.067s
>>sys     0m0.232s
>>
>>That seams to be the case.  The first time it take ages, but the
>>second is OK (still slower than I'd like but....).....
> 
> 
> Shouldn't it be possible to construct the hashcache when the working
> tree is built?
> 
> ~j

It is possible. I think we need to fix the current code anyway (since we
can delay writing, as long as we ensure that we do write).

We also would want to update the hash-cache after a branch upgrade. (We
have code which wipes it out, because we had problems with invalid lines
in older branches. Like v4 branches)

John
=:->


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060111/e8520186/attachment.pgp 


More information about the bazaar mailing list