bzr too slow
John Arbash Meinel
john at arbash-meinel.com
Wed Jan 11 13:31:08 GMT 2006
Johan Rydberg wrote:
> Erik Bågfors <zindar at gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>>On a new branch.
>>
>>: [bagfors at zyrgelkwyt]$ ; time bzr st
>>
>>real 13m30.754s
>>user 9m43.387s
>>sys 0m8.334s
>>
>>: [bagfors at zyrgelkwyt]$ ; time bzr st
>>
>>real 0m5.468s
>>user 0m3.067s
>>sys 0m0.232s
>>
>>That seams to be the case. The first time it take ages, but the
>>second is OK (still slower than I'd like but....).....
>
>
> Shouldn't it be possible to construct the hashcache when the working
> tree is built?
>
> ~j
It is possible. I think we need to fix the current code anyway (since we
can delay writing, as long as we ensure that we do write).
We also would want to update the hash-cache after a branch upgrade. (We
have code which wipes it out, because we had problems with invalid lines
in older branches. Like v4 branches)
John
=:->
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060111/e8520186/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar
mailing list