Fwd: nuclear lauchcodes and nuclear waste

[Denys Duchier]

Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca> writes:

> I think that in addition to this functionality, we may well want the
> ability to re-do a particular revision, but leave the changes introduce
> by later revision.  This operation would, naturally, produce new
> revision-ids.
>
> e.g.
>
> $ bzr status
> $ bzr do-over -r 100

I completely agree... but doesn't it feel very much like some sort of "patch
queue management" functionality?  i.e. you revert to an earlier revision, but
(in some sense) also load a patch queue with all the changesets associated with
reverted revisions.  Then replay the patch queue, possibly modifying things a
bit here and there.

Cheers,

--Denys