keep tutorial in the source tree

[John Arbash Meinel]

Martin Pool wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We discussed last year the idea of storing the tutorial in the source
> tree rather than on the Wiki.  I'm going to merge in a change which does
> this and remove it from the wiki.
> 
> I think the advantages are
> 
>  * changes that modify the behaviour can carry the documentation update
> with them
> 
>  * it's easier to install the tutorial when bzr is installed
> 
>  * we can potentially use doctest to check that all commands function as
> documented
> 
> The main disadvantage is that people who want to contribute improvements
> need to send patches or suggestions to the list rather than editing it
> directly on the wiki, but I think this is not too much of a burden.
> 

I'm okay with this, though not 100%. Having it on the wiki does make it
a lot easier for people to edit. Making a change and hitting submit is a
lot easier than grabbing the source, bringing up vim, changing some
stuff, and then using diff/bzr diff/future bzr submit.

Which Tutorial are you talking about, though. IntroductionToBzr?

John
=:->

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060109/3d0845a9/attachment.pgp