Encoding woes

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Collins wrote:
| Other than that, how does that sound ?
|
| Do we have a +1 on this ?
|
| Are there any -1's ?

+1

I think it's the best thing we can do at the moment.  If it were easier
to create unicode string literals, I'd be in favour of not converting,
just requiring unicode.  This way still has some risk of encoding bugs.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDuhu90F+nu1YWqI0RAqjrAJsGhiS0pLyt8zekjL+/5eGLyE/SDACfTLOH
H2B8TWUBF7Ft0DGOWp4cc0s=
=IM90
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----