[rfc] [merge] removal of support for reverse changeset application

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Denys Duchier wrote:
> Perhaps I'm missing your point, but you don't seem to be disagreeing
> with the approach but with the timing.  

No, I'm disagreeing with the approach.

My goal is to fuse
> apply_changeset and apply_changeset_to_inventory.

I think apply_changeset_to_inventory is more complicated than is needed
to do what it does.  I don't see a justification for doing it that way.

We already have a mechanism to apply metadata changes.  We should use
that, unless there's some compelling reason why we can't.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDqx+N0F+nu1YWqI0RAv8BAJ9SR+NrnDpHu2ti4nN65BB60+kWWACfRuDL
umCWQhkwt64eHluR/TEmDzE=
=9tSG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----