one more question..

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Brett Calcott wrote:
| Aaron Bentley wrote:
|
|> Robert Collins wrote:
|>
|> | At the moment if you have two trees nested, the top tree will ignore
|> the
|> | bottom tree for things like 'add' and will show it as an 'unknown' dir
|> | (which is a bug but not harmful).
|>
|> I'm not sure that it's a bug.  It seems okay to me to treat these
|> directories the same as other directories.  What's the justification for
|> special-casing them?
|>
|
| I guess it is ok, but it is certainly not ideal. I think that bzr should
| at least recognize that the directory is a foreign branch. Especially if
| you try and do an add.

I'm pretty sure you mean "nested tree".  "Foreign branch" means "A
branch that comes from another VCS".  For example, Jan Hudec is working
on SVN foreign branches that would allow you to use SVN branches
directly in bzr.

I agree that bzr should recognize nested trees when you try to add them.
~ I'm not sure about the rest of the time.  It seems reasonable that
you'd bzr ignore them, just like you ignore everything else that isn't
revision controlled in this tree.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDp52S0F+nu1YWqI0RAiRmAJ9XxW04sux1ZdUN7SiwwoJgNMREXwCfftAk
n/Eo4zSZqSNQ/MWD5Q3mSMA=
=97Db
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----