[RFC] per-branch umask

[John Arbash Meinel]

Robert Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 11:16 -0600, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> 
> 
>>Anyway, I'm happy saying everything underneath .bzr/ should have the
>>same permissions. And I don't think it adds a lot of overhead.
>>
>>What about Aaron, Martin, or Robert, do you agree?
> 
> 
> I think the Repository spec should be considered in this.
> 
> so .bzr/repository/* <- same permissions
> .bzr/checkout/* <- same permissions
> .bzr/branch/ <- same permissions
> 
> but those three might vary from each other.

I completely agree. And I think when it is implemented, that is how it
should work.

I also agree that setting umask is evil inside a library. Any sort of
change to global state that was not specifically requested should be
avoided.

I'll spend a little bit of time working on it, and let you know what I
work out.

John
=:->

> 
> Cheers,
> Rob
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20051215/e6dd6a08/attachment.pgp