[RFC] per-branch umask
Matthieu Moy
Matthieu.Moy at imag.fr
Wed Dec 14 17:38:44 GMT 2005
John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> writes:
> For sftp, it would imply an extra round trip for the chmod request, but
> I don't think it is terrible.
I'm a bit worried about this point. I think bzr's network accesses are
already latency-bound. Unless the traffic can be pipelined
efficiently, I'm afraid the overhead will be significant (but I'd be
glad to change my mind if a benchmark proves me wrong).
--
Matthieu
More information about the bazaar
mailing list