Conflict while using "bzr pull"

[James Blackwell]

On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:53:28AM -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> Actually, I just do "rm * -R; bzr revert".  Because .bzr doesn't match
> the * glob, but almost everything revert cares about does.

Grin. When I read his post, I read it as "rm -rf branch/*""

> > What do people think, should we have a "bzr revert --force", or maybe a
> > "bzr revert --everything". I think it would be nice to have a single
> > command which says, "I know things are messed up right now, get me back
> > to exactly FOO, so I can continue with my life".
> 
> Perhaps "bzr revert --pristine" would delete all unversioned files as
> well as restoring source files to the correct names and contents.

-1 to pristine. Though archers know it, it not in the common venacular.
  
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20051213/93806a2c/attachment.pgp