"Archive" or "Repository"?
Erik Bågfors
zindar at gmail.com
Wed Nov 16 13:37:17 GMT 2005
2005/11/16, Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> "Repository" is a term used by CVS, SVN, Darcs, Codeville, Monotone,
> git, SVK, etc.
>
> "Archive" is used by Arch and ArX.
>
> The two terms seem to be roughly equivalent, but "Repository" seems to
> be more widely-used. Is there any reason we shouldn't call our Archives
> Repositories instead?
: [bagfors at zyrgelkwyt]$ ; darcs init --help
Usage: darcs initialize [OPTION]...
Initialize a new source tree as a darcs repository.
: [bagfors at zyrgelkwyt]$ ; bzr init --help
usage: bzr init [LOCATION]
Make a directory into a versioned branch.
: [bagfors at zyrgelkwyt]$ ; darcs get --help
Usage: darcs get [OPTION]... <REPOSITORY> [<DIRECTORY>]
Create a local copy of another repository.
: [bagfors at zyrgelkwyt]$ ; bzr get --help
usage: bzr branch FROM_LOCATION [TO_LOCATION]
aliases: get, clone
Create a new copy of a branch.
bzr calls this a "branch", darcs calls this a repository.
For me, branch means something I create a branch off to do some
hacking on, I will "fork" from that point for a while. If I just run
"bzr get http://....../" all I do is create a local copy of that
repository. As long as I just pull stuff, it's still just a copy of
that repository. If I check something in (and pull stops working),
than it's a branch for me.
That's the way it works in my brain.
For me, "Archive" would be the thing that stores the history and each
commit etc. In a "normal" repository that would be the .bzr directory
but in a centralized storage that would be the central storage.
So, in my mind, a branch might not be the same as a repository, a
repository is not the same as an archive (although it's stored in
one).
But, maybe I'm just adding confusion. I'm happy either way :)
/Erik
More information about the bazaar
mailing list