Scope of operations

[Robert Collins]

On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 23:21 -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> | Yes they can. By internals I mean that we internally operate on full
> | tree snapshots, but that the end user often is working with many related
> | modules in one 'tree', and *their* intent may well be to commit 'this
> | dir down' *more often* than it is to 'commit this whole tree'.
> 
> So by 'I'm starting to think that we are over emphasising the full tree
> aspects of our internals.', you meant 'I think that our UI is too
> strongly influenced by the full-tree nature of our internals'?

'Yes'. :)

> Personally, I like full-tree defaults, but I can understand that.

Much of the time, I do too. But ... [see prior discussion].

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20051115/3dda264c/attachment.pgp