push over sftp

[Jan Hudec]

On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 16:14:14 -0800, Robey Pointer wrote:
> 
> On 3 Nov 2005, at 11:26, Jan Hudec wrote:
> 
> >Especially the secureshell uri draft
> >http://tools.ietf.org/wg/secsh/draft-ietf-secsh-scp-sftp-ssh-uri/ 
> >draft-ietf-secsh-scp-sftp-ssh-uri-03.txt
> >mentioned there might be interesting. Using it is probably most  
> >justifiable
> >approach. Basically it says:
> >
> >sftp://host/dir-in-home
> >sftp://host/%2fhome/user/dir-in-home
> >
> >Since the home directory case is quite a lot more common, I'd vote  
> >for it
> >being the shorter and simpler one.
> >
> >Using unencoded / could be accepted.
> 
> Aha, so they've been updating the draft.  It's a little weirder now,  
> but I do agree that we should follow it, since it also gives us  
> relative paths now.  If nobody else does it, I'll cook up a patch  
> sometime soon.

To be clear, I meant _bzr_ could accept unencoded / -- the draft insists
on %2f.

--
						 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb at ucw.cz>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20051104/c87f2aa5/attachment.pgp