[BUG] Pull command on Windows: we have 2 problems

[Robert Collins]

On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 09:49 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Robert Collins wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 16:32 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>I see those as workarounds.  I'd add
> >>3) change Branch so that read-locked operations will work when Branch is
> >>write-locked.
> > 
> > 
> > This is already the case:
> 
> What I mean is, it should work whether you reuse the same Branch or
> create a new copy of it.

I think thats a really bad idea.

It implies a process wide identity map for the separate lock at a
minimum, and raises IMO hairy questions - for instance, if I open a
write lock in one instance, create a new branch instance and take a read
lock, then close the first instances write lock and grab a new one -
should it succeed or fail?

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20051027/4091cb63/attachment.pgp