bzr-sax actually uses xml.sax interface

[Robey Pointer]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 20 Oct 2005, at 22:47, John A Meinel wrote:

> Is there interest in having some compiled C extensions, for  
> handling the
> performance critical portions? Python distutils has decent support for
> that sort of thing, it means people would need to do "python setup
> install" before using bzr, rather than just having all python code.  
> But
> it seems like we have a couple of very obvious performance areas.  
> Though
> perhaps the append-only weave would fix some of it, I'm not convinced
> that it would.

If you decide to mess around with C extensions, Pyrex seems worth  
checking out:

     http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/~greg/python/Pyrex/

I haven't yet found an excuse to use it myself, so I don't know how  
well it works, but I really like the idea.

robey

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFDWIr9QQDkKvyJ6cMRArVaAKCP3uJgCSiZWhE+yrn18X3PT3iTwgCePKz+
GbEn4b9N/8I/vCsGi0RpINQ=
=s2S8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----