Compressing weaved revisions?

[James Blackwell]

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:28:54AM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 08/10/05, James Blackwell <jblack at merconline.com> wrote:
> > 10735 / (10735 - 8644) = 5.13
> 
> We could probably reduce this by a factor of 2 or 3 by gzipping the
> files.  That's not currently supported and I'm not sure it's a good
> default for local disk, but it may be useful in some cases.

That would be great-- probably be an even match with mercurial (It exceeds
the numbers generated for mercurial, but the comparison wasn't strictly
apples to apples, as it was baz-ng branch history against mercurial branch
history).

> 
> --
> Martin