Slow inventory extraction from weavefile

James Blackwell jblack at merconline.com
Wed Oct 5 09:57:05 BST 2005


On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:08:48AM -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> 
> Yeah 450 is slow.  I'd target maybe 1.5 GHz machines.  But when you
> consider that weaves were invented 30 years ago, and intended to be
> fast, I wonder whether we're missing any optimization tricks.


Thats always possible.

Then again, that claim of "fast" comes from the same generation that
claimed polyester suits were hot, disco was cool.  =) 


> 
> Aaron
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFDQn7g0F+nu1YWqI0RAnkhAJkBQUZLjhrEJMWR2zBeIWYKUzDlTACfRkDP
> v9CY7rt4Dh/8Rqtd9fTiT6Y=
> =hNJM
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20051005/badae17b/attachment.pgp 


More information about the bazaar mailing list