Slow inventory extraction from weavefile
James Blackwell
jblack at merconline.com
Wed Oct 5 09:57:05 BST 2005
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:08:48AM -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
>
> Yeah 450 is slow. I'd target maybe 1.5 GHz machines. But when you
> consider that weaves were invented 30 years ago, and intended to be
> fast, I wonder whether we're missing any optimization tricks.
Thats always possible.
Then again, that claim of "fast" comes from the same generation that
claimed polyester suits were hot, disco was cool. =)
>
> Aaron
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFDQn7g0F+nu1YWqI0RAnkhAJkBQUZLjhrEJMWR2zBeIWYKUzDlTACfRkDP
> v9CY7rt4Dh/8Rqtd9fTiT6Y=
> =hNJM
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20051005/badae17b/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar
mailing list