Ideas requested

[James Blackwell]

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:58:13PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 04/10/05, James Blackwell <jblack at merconline.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 01:08:12PM -0300, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> > > The attached patch adds support for showing merged revisions
> > > in the log, and was built against the current newformat branch.
> >
> > Does anybody have a suggestion for how we should record this sort of thing
> > on the wiki? I gave a quick attempt at finding the posts on gmane. This
> > seemed to be a bit awkward.
> 
> Record the conversation or the patch or something else?

The patch. On the wiki, if a patch hasn't been picked up by someone after
a few days, I put up a link to the bzr tree with a short description of
what it does. 

We don't have a way yet that I like to represent this on the wiki for
diffs on the list. Hunting around msgids on gmane or l.c.c doesn't feel
"right".

What do you think about a new mailing list... say bzr-mergeme@, where I
can silently bounce these emails to if they look like they're falling
between the cracks? You and Rob can subscribe to the list and procmail it
off into a folder so that when you see it on the wiki, its already there
on your systems.

My ultimate goal here is to avoid any sort sort of hint of a -t blackhole.
I'm happy to provide that second line of defense to avoid things falling
through the floorboards. I do want to avoid anything that vaguely
approaches being a pain in the ass. 

> A link to the archive on lists.canonical.com is probably best for the
> discussion (though the interface is less nice than gmane); a link to
> patchwork.ozlabs.org may be best for the patch.

oh! oh! This looks perfect! How do things get on here? 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20051005/737be73d/attachment.pgp