[PLUGIN] bzr uncommit updated

[Kevin Smith]

John Yates wrote:
> and if we assume that the vast majority of
> Windows boxes likely to run bzr will be W2K or later
> and will be NTFS-based, then you can exploit hardlinks.

I don't think it makes a big difference in the current discussion, but 
many (most?) W2K boxes still use FAT32, and even many XP boxes.

My real agenda for this post is to pontificate that it's great to take 
advantage of hardlinks when available, but that no important 
functionality should rely heavily on them. Fortunately, the bzr team 
already seems to believe that.

Cheers,

Kevin