selftest.backtick versus selftest.run_bzr

[David Clymer]

On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 13:53 -0400, David Clymer wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 12:09 -0400, John A Meinel wrote:
> > I'm trying to write some more test cases. These are supposed to be
> > external tests (as in making sure that the cmd_* functions are working
> > correctly from the outside).
> > 
> > >From what I can tell, there are 2 convenience functions to consider,
> > self.backtick() and self.run_bzr(). run_bzr() actually just invokes the
> > in-memory bzr library (which I am okay with), but I can't find a way to
> > get the output of the command.
> 
> I think there is an example of capturing output from run_bzr in
> TestCase.test_add_reports() in blackbox.py using self.apply_redirected()

Err.. TestCommands, not TestCase

-davidc
-- 
gpg-key: http://www.zettazebra.com/files/key.gpg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050917/01099d59/attachment.pgp