[Patch] bzr status doesn't handle revision

[Jari Aalto]

Martin Pool <martinpool at gmail.com> writes:

| On 11/09/05, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy at imag.fr> wrote:
| 
| > Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca> writes:
| > 
| > > Robert Collins wrote:
| > >> I've taken this into integration as it doesn't make sense to me for
| > >> 'status --revision FOO' to do anything anyway.
| 
| I'll also add my vote for 'status -r' to show a summary of changes
| since then, and even for 'status -r A..B' to show a summary of change
| from A to B.  Obviously if A and B are historical there will never be
| unknown or ignored files.

Err, did you mean to use the colon(:) here?

     status -r A:B

It would be consistent, like with

    bzr diff
    bzr diff -r1
    bzr diff -r1:2

Jari