FEATURE REQ: group common commands under 'ls' instead of separate commands

Jari Aalto jari.aalto at cante.net
Sat Sep 10 22:55:12 BST 2005

Jan Hudec <bulb at ucw.cz> writes:

| On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 10:25:33 -0400, Kevin Smith wrote:
| > Jari Aalto wrote:
| > >I would like to propose changing this into common "list" command instead, 
| > >which could be easily extended with aliases etc. That is:
| > >
| > >      bzr ls deleted
| > >      bzr ls ignored
| > >      bzr ls unknowns
| > >
| The last one, ls, is similar to inventory, but it operates on checked-in
| revisions (either local or remote), while inventory operates on the working
| copy. So ls does not have any unversioned entries to bother with. This agrees
| with how subversion uses the 'ls' command.

That's the reason I suggested 'ls', because it is already used by
subversion and would therefore be familiar when switching version
control tools.


More information about the bazaar mailing list