På Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:31:24PM +0300, Nir Soffer skrev:
> On 30 Aug, 2005, at 18:19, Denys Duchier wrote:
>> It seems to me that the "fragment" notation of URIs[1] was designed
>> precisely for these sort of applications. It would suggest something
>> like this: http://www.site.com/my/bzr/branch#1040
> Make sense, easy to type and parse, looks clean.
Remember that fragments point to a fragment (a part!) of a document, not to
a complete (sub)document. Fragments are used only at the client side to
scroll the window in case of a webpage or to do other things in case of eg.
xpointer.
mvrgr, Wouter
--
:wq mail uws at xs4all.nl
web http://uwstopia.nl
it's the one fatal flaw :: let us swallow you all, you all -- gomez
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050830/057d52b5/attachment.pgp