[PATCH]: shell-complete command
schizo at debian.org
Tue Aug 23 15:08:23 BST 2005
> Right now the -r code is all parsed at the same point, and it is up to
> the individual command to detect if it is passed too many (or too few)
> revisions, and complain accordingly. (This doesn't necessarily help your
> autocomplete code, though).
No, so that information needs to be duplicated elsewhere or moved higher up.
Where should it go?
> Also, it might be nice to have the range of revisions show up (1..1720)
> when you autocomplete a number, that could tell you what range of
> integers is available. (Don't complete, but show the actual range). I
> don't know if that is tricky with bash autocomplete.
It's not tricky with zsh. I have little knowledge of bash.
> Well, currently, the arguments to an option, all *have* to be parsed by
> the same code. The dictionary maps option names to a function which will
> parse them, and then the parsed result gets passed to the command using
> a matching variable name.
> So in some ways, yes, they all take the same potential arguments.
> However, if the parser is "str" or "unicode", then the parser doesn't do
> much, and it is up to the command to make sense of it. (I'm guessing for
> those two, that yes, they are always treated the same).
"str" or "unicode" is much too generic to be helpful; one can't offer
all possible strings as potential completion matches.
More information about the bazaar