A few questions/potential issues in Bazaar-NG

Aaron Bentley aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca
Sun Aug 21 17:56:10 BST 2005


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John A Meinel wrote:
> You've said a few times about bzr using weaves, and to my knowledge,
> that is just one possibility. There are a few of us which are concerned
> about how weaves would work. I think both Aaron Bentley and I prefer
> 'revfiles' which I think are from mercurial. Which are append-only and a
> mix of deltas and full texts, which should be fully possible to do
> safely over sftp.

AIUI, weaves would be much better than the current storage for
branching, and only marginally worse for pulls.

It's also possible to do append-only weaves.  Trivially, you can just
store the weave itself in a revfile.  I have also done some work on a
natively append-only weave format; you can see my work-so-far here:

http://www.aaronbentley.com/weavediff

So I'm comfortable going with weaves for now since
1. latency trumps throughput most of the time, and weaves are only
somewhat larger than the original files
2. we can do append-only weaves later, if we think it's valuable.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDCLIq0F+nu1YWqI0RAqNgAJ9uTCgc8nAHKvN9IEKe9k7x3cYDUwCfTeiM
2KGIv3QpdCWtX0NtsFwNtPw=
=K7Gr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the bazaar mailing list