Are read-only stores a bug?

[Michael Ellerman]

On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:02 am, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 19 Jun 2005, Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca> wrote:
> > If we wanted to keep the stores readonly, I suppose we could have a "bzr
> > unbranch" command that would only delete bzr branches.
>
> Maybe it could check that all the changes have been merged
> (somewhere?) and there's nothing uncommitted or unknown.

That'd be even better. I always hesitate before deleting a branch, and do a 
mental check that I'm really done with it. But I've still lost work in the 
past, it'd be great if bzr could check for me.

Dunno about "unbranch" though :D

cheers

-- 
Michael Ellerman
IBM OzLabs

email: michael:ellerman.id.au
inmsg: mpe:jabber.org
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050620/f8986079/attachment.pgp