Any chance for my patches

[John A Meinel]

There are a number of patches that I have submitted, and I was wondering
 if any of them had a chance. As near as I could tell, none of them have
even been rejected.

Specifically, there was a patch to allow short options to have attached
arguments, so you could do "bzr diff -r542" instead of "bzr diff -r
542". It used the fact that you know if a short option takes an argument.

Then a patch for allowing 'bzr log' to take a revision to print, or a
range of revisions (this was layered on a patch to allow -r to take a
colon separated set of revisions).

There was a patch to add create_simple_project into the testing
structure, to allow more testing with a know simple project.

There was also the patch for native python plugins. The only negative
comment was that BZRPATH was overloaded between run-only commands and
plugin commands. I have no problem switching it to use BZR_PLUGIN_PATH,
or anything else, if that will lead to it's inclusion. I know abentley
expressed interest in it, and I'm willing to clean it up as requested.

There are "bigger fish to fry", but these are all relatively small
pieces, which I think are incrementally better than what we have now.

If there is anything I can do to improve my chances of success, just let
me know.

John
=:->
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050522/c42dc34a/attachment.pgp