bazaar-ng copyright policy
aaron.bentley at utoronto.ca
Thu Apr 21 02:55:59 BST 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Martin Pool wrote:
| It has been proposed that we should keep all of the bazaar-ng code
| copyright by a single entity, as is done by Python, Zope and Apache.
| That entity will be Canonical Ltd, which has committed to make the
| project always remain free. This allows actions down the track such as
| adding licence exceptions to link to other code or legal defense without
| having to chase down all the original authors. To effect this we will
| need to ask for a copyright assignment note in gpg-signed email with
| nontrivial patches (say >15 lines). Does this sound reasonable?
I'm willing to assign my copyright to Canonical.
I'm not sure I see the value in having license exceptions. I would want
everyone to have equal rights wrt the code. But I do see value in being
able to change the license later, as Mozilla and Wine have done.
I don't see why legal defence requires a single entity. In fact, as I
understand it, gpl-violations.org has benefitted from the fact that
there's no single entity controlling Linux. Instead of having to get
The Linux Consortium to commit to a GPL lawsuit, they only have to get a
single Linux contributor involved.
Oh, and I assume that we can just do the copyright thing once, and not
have to assign copyright every time we submit a nontrivial patch.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the bazaar