bzr 0.0.3 released

[Martin Pool]

On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 12:58 +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote:

> > Can't 'bzr rename' do the first and 'bzr move' both? All the Linux
> > hackers, people used to UNIX and Windows users could be happy that way,
> > couldn't they?
> 
> Actually I was about to suggest the same.

OK, that might be a good way to do it.

> Also it would be nice if it were possible to do "bzr mv" after the mv
> has already happend (darcs does allow this).

Yes, I plan to do that.  I see darcs seems to automatically do that if
the source doesn't exist in the working directory and the destination
does, which is pretty clever.

> And somewhat related to mv, I think that automatically removing files
> from the repo is a really bad idea. Think of "vi a", "mv b c", "bzr
> commit". "mv b c" should have been "bzr mv", but now b has silently been
> removed without any warning. No file should get added without "bzr add",
> and none removed without "bzr remove".

Only 'no warning' if you commit without checking the status or diff,
which I suppose people do sometimes do.

So you'd rather have an error if you tried to commit when some files had
been removed?

-- 
Martin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050407/dc968f47/attachment.pgp