[apparmor] [RFC] How to handle multiple opencl implementations?

[Vincas Dargis]

On 5/9/18 9:24 PM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 19:55 +0300, Vincas Dargis wrote:
>> So:
>>
>> A. we have additional opencl-common?
>>
>> B. we don't care too much yet and expect generic `opencl` abstraction
>> to
>> be used with all implementations included by default _and_ common
>> rules
>> inline, until we get conditional support?
> 
> C. in each opencl-* abstraction, include all the rules it needs to work
> standalone. Ie, each has `/etc/OpenCL/** r,`
> 
> This is what I was expecting, but I wouldn't be opposed to opencl-
> common if it had more than that one rule (I don't care for abstractions
> that are too fine-grained).
> 

OK I'll work on splitting abstraction, see how many common rules are 
there, and maybe propose opencl-common if needed.