[apparmor] [Patch 0/4] change accept node handling during expr tree set

[John Johansen]

This series of patches changes the way accept nodes are generated
and the expression tree is set-up around them. It is a start to the
backend refactoring and cleanup, and provides a nice little performance
boost in most cases because
  1. It reduces the number of accept nodes geneted and considered during
     simplification/factoring, and node set building (shorter node sets
     to construct and compare)
  2. It reduces the number of Alt nodes (used to combine the accept nodes)
     to consider during simplfication, and node set building (agin shorter
     node sets to construct and compare)
  3. It reduces the number of nodes that must be consider in any given
     simplification pass, by separating out node sets that can't be
     simplified on the right hand simplification/factoring pass.

The performance change is dependent on the profile being parsed, and
there is no guarentee that it will be faster for all profiles. With that
being said, I haven't seen any performance regressions+ and some fairly
nice performance improvements so its worth considering before the rest
of the backend factoring is done.

Eg. Using a few example profile tests from a local machine, comparing
against the 2.9 parser in Ubuntu 14.10 against current 2.10 with
these patches*

profile       with tree simplification      -O no-expr-simplify
-------       -----------------------       -------------------
evince              22% faster                   10% faster
firefox             40% faster                   11% faster
chromium            32% faster                   11% faster
cupsd               35% faster                    3% faster
dnsmasq             12% faster                   17% faster
dhclient            36% faster                    5% faster
klogd                0%                           8% faster

*Note: 2.10 is actually handicapped by a couple fixes to change_profile
 encoding that causes its dfa to have a few extra nodes.
+There was some regression, in a few cases on individual runs but when
 averaged over a few runs, the timing variations resulted in small net
 wins, in those cases.