[apparmor] [PATCH 09/20] add helper fn to query file path permissions

Tyler Hicks tyhicks at canonical.com
Mon Jun 1 17:47:35 UTC 2015


On 2015-06-01 10:18:34, John Johansen wrote:
> On 06/01/2015 06:46 AM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> > On 2015-05-31 18:00:25, Christian Boltz wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Am Freitag, 29. Mai 2015 schrieb Tyler Hicks:
> >>> On 2015-05-30 00:00:25, Christian Boltz wrote:
> >>>> Am Freitag, 29. Mai 2015 schrieb Tyler Hicks:
> >>>>> On 2015-05-29 01:39:15, John Johansen wrote:
> >>>>>> +int aa_query_file(uint32_t mask, const char *label, const char
> >>>>>> *path, +		  int *allowed, int *audited)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I prefer that we require 'size_t label_len' and 'size_t path_len'
> >>>>> parameters. The caller may already have the string lengths stored
> >>>>> in
> >>>>> variables, eliminating unnecessary calls to strlen(). Also, it
> >>>>> allows
> >>>>> for non-nul-terminated strings to be used.
> >>>>
> >>>> You mean you want to call the function with path "foo\0" and
> >>>> path_len
> >>>> 12345?
> >>>>
> >>>> Personally, I prefer an unnecessary strlen() call over an option to
> >>>> allow someone to hand in invalid data (and, caused by that, possibly
> >>>> doing funny[tm] things) ;-)
> >>>
> >>> You may not be aware that strlen() requires the string to be
> >>> nul-terminated. If they wanted to shoot themselves in the foot or "do
> >>> funny things" they could just pass in a non nul-terminated string to
> >>> aa_query_file().
> >>
> >> I don't know too much about C, but I already heard that strings must be 
> >> \0-terminated ;-) and I'm not really surprised that strlen() needs the 
> >> \0 to find the end.
> >>
> >>> Also, libapparmor is in the process' address space. It makes no
> >>> difference if we allow the caller to specify the string length or
> >>> not...
> >>
> >> So basically we have to decide if we
> >> a) reduce the number of function parameters, which makes it easier for
> >>    callers, but also means that the string _must be_ \0-terminated
> >> b) have a parameter for the string len, which could possibly come with a
> >>    wrong value
> >>
> >> At least for non-C callers (we have perl/python/whatever bindings for 
> >> libapparmor), option a) sounds better to me.
> > 
> > The string length parameters really only make sense for the C API. The
> > bindings for higher level languages probably shouldn't require string
> > length parameters.
> > 
> Well in the file path case, an embedded \0 is not allowed as part of the
> query so passing the arg is a performance optimization.
> 
> These helper fns are just wrappers around the query api, so that apps
> don't need to know the format of the queries.
> 
> I'm fine with putting in the length parameter but I find it weired that
> we would want length in the C api and not in other languages. Also since
> currently our other language apis are generated with swig, the length
> parameter argument will likely carry over.
> 
> I'm fine with putting the length in as an arg, I just want to make sure
> that is what we want to do

int aa_query_file_len(uint32_t mask, const char *label, size_t label_len,
                      const char *path, size_t path_len,
                      int *allowed, int *audited)
{
	...
}

int aa_query_file_nul(uint32_t mask, const char *label, const char *path,
                      int *allowed, int *audited)
{
        return aa_query_file(mask, label, strlen(label), path,
                             strlen(path), allowed, audited);
}

Best of both worlds?

Tyler
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/apparmor/attachments/20150601/d2735a25/attachment.pgp>


More information about the AppArmor mailing list