[apparmor] [patch] C tools: rename __unused macro

[Steve Beattie]

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 04:00:12PM -0700, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 03:45:46PM -0700, Steve Beattie wrote:
> > Not at all. Honestly, my preferences are:
> > 
> > 1) __unused — simple, clear, straightforward annotation. Alas,
> >    conflicts with a symbol in older glibcs and with convention of __
> >    prefixed symbols being system synbols. I wish gcc just went ahead
> >    and defined this.
> > 
> > 2) __aa_unused — nearly as simple as __unused; the underscores
> >    indicate specialness, the __aa_ prefix makes it less likely to
> >    conflict with any actual system symbol name, despite intruding on
> >    the system symbol convention. NACK'ed by Christian, so would need
> >    at least one more ACK to be acceptable. (_aa_unused has the same
> >    problem, standards-wise,)
> 
> Sorry Christian. :)
> 
> __aa_unused please.
> 
> Acked-by: Seth Arnold <seth.arnold at canonical.com>

Right, I have your ack, which counter balances Christian's
nack. But I'd need one more to commit (I have mine and yours, if
I'm understanding http://wiki.apparmor.net/index.php/CommitPolicy
correctly).

-- 
Steve Beattie
<sbeattie at ubuntu.com>
http://NxNW.org/~steve/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/apparmor/attachments/20140930/ab29e1e0/attachment.pgp>