[apparmor] [PATCH] utils: Handle unmount rules
Christian Boltz
apparmor at cboltz.de
Tue Jun 3 17:19:28 UTC 2014
Hello,
Am Montag, 2. Juni 2014 schrieb Tyler Hicks:
> Bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1325109
>
> The parser will accept rules with either umount or unmount rule types.
> The utils should follow suite.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks at canonical.com>
> ---
> utils/apparmor/aa.py | 2 +-
> utils/test/test-mount_parse.py | 12 ++++++++++++
> utils/test/test-regex_matches.py | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
[...]
> --- a/utils/test/test-mount_parse.py
> +++ b/utils/test/test-mount_parse.py
> + def test_parse_plain_unmount_rule(self):
> + rule = 'unmount,'
> + mount = aa.parse_mount_rule(rule)
> + self.assertEqual(rule, mount.serialize(),
> + 'mount object returned "%s", expected "%s"' %
> (mount.serialize(), rule)) +
> + def test_parse_unmount_with_mount_point(self):
> + rule = 'unmount /mnt/external,'
> + mount = aa.parse_mount_rule(rule)
> + self.assertEqual(rule, mount.serialize(),
> + 'mount object returned "%s", expected "%s"' %
Doing this with an array and a loop is still on your TODO list, right?
;-)
That said,
Acked-by: Christian Boltz <apparmor at cboltz.de>
Regards,
Christian Boltz
--
>Jetzt, wo du es sagst. Ich benutze aber immer cat. Auch wenn ich mit
>grep eine Datei durchsuchen will. Keine Ahnung warum.
>Ich glaube, dass ich das mal am Anfang irgendwo gelesen habe, und dann
>hat es sich ins Hirn eingebrannt.
*tsk* Ich glaub, wir muessen dich mal einer Gehirnwaesche unterziehen...
[> Marcus Habermehl und David Haller in suse-linux]
More information about the AppArmor
mailing list