[apparmor] GSoC review r26 and r27

[John Johansen]

On 07/27/2013 10:02 AM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> see the attached file for r26 and r27 review notes.
> 
> @John: I'm still waiting for your answer about
>     # ix implies m, so we don't need to add m if ix is present
> 
so ignore this, as we are not doing this

> I have some profiles that contain "mrix" (for example sbin.dhclient and 
> usr.sbin.ntpd), so either the old logprof was buggy or the comment is 
> wrong ;-)
> 
neither, it was actually a change in kernel behavior that affected policy.
It used to be that m was not needed for ix because of where the tests
where done.

A change in that behavior happened 5 or 6 years ago.

so at best the comment should have been changed as this rolled through