[apparmor] Where should the new aa-exec live in packaging

John Johansen john.johansen at canonical.com
Thu Jul 25 16:31:07 UTC 2013


On 07/25/2013 03:57 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On 07/24/2013 05:29 PM, John Johansen wrote:
>> On 07/24/2013 02:35 PM, Steve Beattie wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:26:43AM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> 
>>> directory becoming more of an architecture dependent collection of
>>> binaries. But it's not a strongly held position.
>>>
>> I actually don't want the parser dir to be a dumping ground. I'd rather
>> move in the direction of moving the init scripts out of there and
>> having packages put them into the parser package or their own package.
>>
> To be clear, you don't mind aa-exec moving there for now, you just don't want
> every future compiled binary to move there. Correct? I agree with that.
> 
> 
To be clear I'd rather it didn't, and I'd like to pull the none parser bits
that already live there out as well.

With that said I could like with it there, though I don't see it being much
more work to just create a binary-utils directory, and avoid creating more
work (that will never get done) for ourselves in the future.




More information about the AppArmor mailing list