[apparmor] 2.8 Nominations

John Johansen john.johansen at canonical.com
Thu Jan 3 01:58:41 UTC 2013


On 01/02/2013 04:27 PM, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:21:20PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
>> I propose to backport the following patches to the 2.8 tree:
>>
>> - [3/9] nvidia abstractions cleanups
>> - [5/9] skype profile - even if it's a quite big patch. OTOH there are 
>>   only additions, so it should be safe ;-)
>> - [6/9] add XCompose to abstractions/X
>> - [9/9] dnsmasq
>>
>> The other patches (/proc -> /@{PROC} and @{pid} are too noisy for a 
>> minor release IMHO and don't bring a real benefit, so I don't think we 
>> should backport them.
> 
> Yes, I agree (and thus Acked-by: Steve Beattie <sbeattie at ubuntu.com>).
> For the record these are the following trunk commits:
> 
>   2090 - [3/9] nvidia abstractions cleanups
>   2092 - [5/9] skype profile
>   2093 - [6/9] add XCompose to abstractions/X
>   2096 - [9/9] dnsmasq
> 
Acked here as well

> I'd also like to nominate the following trunk commits for 2.8.1:
> 
>   2065.1.1 - update fonts abstraction for new fontconfig paths
>   2065.1.3 - update gnome abstraction to allow reading
>              /usr/share/poppler/cMap/**
>   2066 - parser - *just* the updated caching test message from this commit [1]
>   2074 - tests - fix clone test on arm
>   2076 - parser tests - fix test driver for exec() failure
>   2079 - libapparmor - add pkgconfig support
>   2083 - parser tests - fix fine grained timestamp detection in caching tests
>   2084 - tests - paper over possible race in onexec test
> 
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen at canonical.com>

> [1] It looks like this leaked in to the directory walking commit by
>     mistake. It's a fine change on it's own right.
> 
> as well as the following updates to the ubuntu abstractions:
> 
>   2057 - update ubuntu-browsers.d/java for IcedTea 7
>   2058 - let sanitized-helper also allow access to /usr/local
>   2059 - ubuntu-integration does not work properly with exo-open
> 
Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen at canonical.com>

> I'm more ambivalent about the following trunk commits. I'm nominating
> them for 2.8, but could be convinced to that they should not be
> included:
> 
>   2050 - parser - network rules debugging statements
>   2064 - parser - update apparmor_parser man page
>   2065 - parser - correct apparmor_parser -N command privilege
>   2069 - profiles - install extras into /usr/share/apparmor/extra-profiles/
>   2075 - tests - support alternate parser locations
>   2078 - profiles - add winbindd profile
> 
yeah I think these are worth pulling back as well

Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen at canonical.com>




More information about the AppArmor mailing list