[apparmor] backport request: aa-decode
apparmor at cboltz.de
Tue Jan 1 16:32:43 UTC 2013
Am Dienstag, 1. Januar 2013 schrieb John Johansen:
> On 01/01/2013 02:35 AM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> > I'd like to request backporting aa-decode to the 2.8 branch.
> > Well, "backporting" is a too big word because I'd simply replace the
> > totally broken aa-decode in 2.8 with the working aa-decode from
> > trunk.
> > Any objections?
> None at all, I'll 2nd copying trunk aa-decode into the 2.8 branch for
OK. Before I update aa-decode in the 2.8 branch, I have an additional
question (which I forgot when I wrote the previous mail):
I have a small patch pending for aa-decode which got some discussion in
November, but no formal ACK or NACK.
See "[patch] aa-decode performance tuning" from 2012-11-01.
I could interpret this as "nobody objected + timeout", but I'd prefer a
more formal response ;-) (preferable an ACK ;-)
I'd also like to include the performance patch in the 2.8 tree.
Therefore I'll wait with backporting aa-decode until I have a response
for the performance tuning patch.
Wenn du willst kannst du das so machen, du kannst dir dann aber auch
genausogut mit ner Hilti ein schickes Schaedel-Piercing machen... Das
tut uebrigens auch nur ganz kurz weh... [David Haller in suse-linux]
More information about the AppArmor