[apparmor] backport request: aa-decode

Christian Boltz apparmor at cboltz.de
Tue Jan 1 16:32:43 UTC 2013


Am Dienstag, 1. Januar 2013 schrieb John Johansen:
> On 01/01/2013 02:35 AM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> > I'd like to request backporting aa-decode to the 2.8 branch.
> > Well, "backporting" is a too big word because I'd simply replace the
> > totally broken aa-decode in 2.8 with the working aa-decode from
> > trunk.

> > Any objections?
> None at all, I'll 2nd copying trunk aa-decode into the 2.8 branch for
> 2.8.1

OK. Before I update aa-decode in the 2.8 branch, I have an additional 
question (which I forgot when I wrote the previous mail):

I have a small patch pending for aa-decode which got some discussion in 
November, but no formal ACK or NACK.
See "[patch] aa-decode performance tuning" from 2012-11-01.

I could interpret this as "nobody objected + timeout", but I'd prefer a 
more formal response ;-) (preferable an ACK ;-)

I'd also like to include the performance patch in the 2.8 tree. 
Therefore I'll wait with backporting aa-decode until I have a response 
for the performance tuning patch.


Christian Boltz
Wenn du willst kannst du das so machen,  du kannst dir dann aber auch
genausogut mit ner Hilti ein schickes Schaedel-Piercing machen... Das
tut uebrigens auch nur ganz kurz weh...  [David Haller in suse-linux]

More information about the AppArmor mailing list