[Vote] Postman

[Bhavani Shankar R]

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Bhavani Shankar R <bhavi at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:10 PM, David Planella
> <david.planella at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> Al 21/09/12 00:24, En/na Andrew Mitchell ha escrit:
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:54:18AM +0200, David Planella wrote:
>>>> Al 03/09/12 16:04, En/na Bhavani Shankar R ha escrit:
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Ed . <schumifer at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> If I understood the Lintian error correctly, it should be fixed now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ed
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The short description seems good now
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Ed!
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> In one of the monthly conversations with the Consumer Apps (CA) team to
>>>> promote Open Source apps as banners in the Software Centre, I suggested
>>>> having Postman as our new featured app.
>>>>
>>>> It currently simply needs 2 votes to be approved and then published.
>>>> I've also noticed I can no longer find it in the MyApps queue [1]. Has
>>>> it been deleted?
>>>>
>>>> @ARB: could you help with the 2 remaining reviews and votes?
>>>> @Ed: could you give us the URL to Postman in MyApps, or resubmit it if
>>>> you've deleted it?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> David.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/arb/
>>>
>>> It looks like it's been resubmitted as https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/apps/1612/
>>> I've grabbed the source package from the PPA & it mostly looks good, the only
>>> concerns I have at the moment are the copyright on the logos for the various
>>> services, as they each have their own terms of use for how the logos are
>>> used, and copyright on logos such as these should be detailed in
>>> debian/copyright.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks a lot Andrew.
>>
>> From your review, do you think you could you list which logos are
>> missing copyright and how they should be listed in the debian/copyright
>> file?
>>
>> Ed might or might not be familiar with Debian packaging, and I think a
>> hint on how to do this would help unblocking the review and getting
>> Postman into the Software Center.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>
> Hey David,
>
> All the logos after resubmission, should be listed according to their
> licenses in d/copyright
>
> This link will help out on the same (I havent looked at the
> resubmitted package though)
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#examples
>

Just took a look at the package in detail

I think the logos and icons Andrew was referring to was (Please
correct me if I'm wrong)

-rw-r--r-- root/root      9743 2012-09-02 02:27
./opt/extras.ubuntu.com/postman/share/postman/media/picasaLogo.png
-rw-r--r-- root/root      3054 2012-09-02 02:27
./opt/extras.ubuntu.com/postman/share/postman/media/ubuntuOneLogo.png
-rw-r--r-- root/root     11115 2012-09-02 02:27
./opt/extras.ubuntu.com/postman/share/postman/media/googlePlusLogo.png
-rw-r--r-- root/root      1966 2012-09-02 02:27
./opt/extras.ubuntu.com/postman/share/postman/media/flickrLogo.png

Regarding g+ logo usage you can name the author name as google
corporation and you can use something of this sort
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Google%2B_logo.png and can be stated
under public domain I guess (in d/copyright)

Same goes with Ubuntu one, flickr and picasa I guess.

As I said earlier, Andrew: Please correct me if I'm wrong here

Regards,


-- 
Bhavani Shankar
Ubuntu Developer       |  www.ubuntu.com
https://launchpad.net/~bhavi