changing review requirements

[Bhavani Shankar R]

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Allison Randal <allison at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In the UDS session yesterday, we discussed a change to the review/voting
> requirements on apps, to help speed up the review process. In a
> nutshell, the proposal is:
>
> - Instead of requiring three +1s from ARB members, we will require one
> technical +1 review from any Ubuntu Developer, and one compliance +1
> review from an ARB member.
>

+1 as it significantly reduces the load on arb members :)

> - When announcing this change, also make it publicly known that we're
> equally happy if Ubuntu Developers want to contribute by adopting apps
> from the ARB queue for universe+backports or debian-mentors. (Using
> their judgment picking out the apps that are substantial enough to make
> sense in universe or Debian.)
>
>

+1 again as many apps in the queue (from the app showdown for
instance) are fit to be introduced in universe/debian too

> For ARB members, does this match what you remember (if you were at the
> session), or does this sound reasonable (if you're following UDS
> remotely)? If you all agree, I'll take it to the Tech Board.
>
> Allison
>

+1 from me.

Regards
-- 
Bhavani Shankar
Ubuntu Developer       |  www.ubuntu.com
https://launchpad.net/~bhavi