Deciding on criteria of requirements on next round of recruitments.

[Andrew Mitchell]

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 07:05:13PM +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Bhavani Shankar R <bhavi at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > As a fall back from the previous arb meeting, Since we are 3 members
> > right now out of the full strength 7 members in the team, we thought
> > it would be good to go in for another round of recruitment to the
> > team.
> >
> > Below was the criteria used in the previous round:
> >
> > ideal candidates would be a ubuntu developer with endorsement from one
> > of the ubuntu developers and have some, interest/experience in things
> > like creating new lintian checks, generating apparmor profiles, or
> > otherwise improving the tools to assist package reviews. Experience in
> > MOTU, Core Dev, Archive Admin, Backports, DMB, or Debian
> > Developer/Maintainer would be considered a plus, but not required.
> >
> > (Unfortunately, it turned out to be a poor response receiving 2
> > applications last time around)
> >
> > Any inputs/feedback on the above criteria welcome.
> >
> 
> Hi Andrew/Alessio,
> 
> Any feedback appreciated :-)
> 
> Regards,
> 

The criteria used last time are fine to re-use, I think being an ubuntu
developer is a requirement, all other criteria are just nice to have.

Andrew